What the best leaders do when they don’t know the answer
- Tom Verrall

- Jun 22
- 3 min read

There’s a moment that happens in almost every leadership career. A question comes - from a board, a team, a journalist, a difficult stakeholder - and the leader doesn’t know the answer.
What happens next is surprisingly revealing.
The pressure to perform certainty.
Most leaders feel it. The tacit expectation that they should have the answer; that uncertainty, admitted openly, will be read as weakness or incompetence. That the room will lose confidence in them. That something will slip.
So they do what the situation seems to demand. They fill the space. They speak with more conviction than they feel. They give an answer that is technically defensible, or may even sound a touch defensive. Or they deflect entirely. They change the subject, reframe the question, or buy time in ways the sharper people in the room quietly notice.
None of this is dishonest, at least not directly so. It’s an understandable reaction. But it isn’t quite right. It isn’t a demonstration of integrity. And, over time, people around them start to sense it.
What the best leaders do differently
The most effective leaders I’ve observed share something that sounds obvious, but is actually quite hard to make peace with: they’re ok with not knowing everything.
Not in a passive sense. Not as an excuse for being unprepared. But as a genuine orientation; an understanding that in complex organisations, facing complex problems, certainty is often not available. And that pretending otherwise rarely makes anyone safer - in fact, if anything, it just makes the leader a bit harder to trust.
What they do instead is something more interesting
They name the uncertainty clearly and without apology. Not ‘that’s a great question’ as a stalling tactic (sometimes that might be appropriate), but a genuine ‘I don’t have a confident answer to that yet.’ Said steadily, without visible anxiety, that statement communicates something powerful; that this is a leader who knows the difference between what they know and what they don’t. Which is, I believe, one of the most reassuring things a leader can demonstrate.
Composure is a message in itself
Here’s what matters most in those moments. It isn’t finding the answer. It’s the emotional state the leader is in while they’re not having one.
A leader who becomes visibly rattled by a question they can’t answer communicates fragility; not just about that question, but about their capacity to handle difficulty more broadly. The room doesn’t only hear the words, the room also reads everything else too: the body, the tone, the pace, the quality of attention.
A leader who can sit with not knowing - who can say ‘I want to think about that properly before I answer’ and mean it, and hold the room while they say it - communicates something impressive. They communicate that uncertainty is something they can navigate, rather than something that destabilises them.
That composure is itself a form of leadership. And that composure is more valuable to the room than the answer would have been.
The follow-through
There’s a discipline that goes with this that the best leaders don’t skip. When you say you’ll come back to something, you come back to it. Specifically, and promptly.
This sounds obvious - but It’s surprisingly uncommon. The moment passes, the pressure lifts, and the commitment gets quietly forgotten. What that communicates - again, quietly - is that the original admission of uncertainty was a tactic rather than an honest statement.
The follow-through is what makes it real.
What this requires
A degree of security that isn’t always easy to come by. The ability to tolerate being seen as not having the answer, without that threatening your sense of your own competence.
For many leaders, that security develops over time - through experience, through seeing that admitting uncertainty doesn’t actually cause the catastrophe they feared.
For others, it requires something more deliberate. A more conscious examination of what they believe the room needs from them, and whether that belief is actually serving them.
What I find, consistently, is that the leaders others most want to follow are not the ones who seem to have all the answers. They’re the ones who seem honest about what they know, clear about what they don’t, and unshaken by the difference.
That quality is worth cultivating. And it starts, perhaps counterintuitively, with getting more comfortable saying three words: I don’t know.
If how you show up under pressure is something you’d like to work on, I’d be glad to have a conversation about what that might involve.
I've coached senior leaders, diplomats, negotiators and other professionals working under intense pressure.
Book your discovery call today for a relaxed, focused chat to see how I can support.



Comments